limit of integration

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$



I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Yes, it is correct.
    – uniquesolution
    Aug 9 at 19:40










  • @uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
    – H-H
    Aug 9 at 20:24














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$



I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Yes, it is correct.
    – uniquesolution
    Aug 9 at 19:40










  • @uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
    – H-H
    Aug 9 at 20:24












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$



I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?







share|cite|improve this question














We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$



I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 9 at 20:23

























asked Aug 9 at 17:42









H-H

30118




30118











  • Yes, it is correct.
    – uniquesolution
    Aug 9 at 19:40










  • @uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
    – H-H
    Aug 9 at 20:24
















  • Yes, it is correct.
    – uniquesolution
    Aug 9 at 19:40










  • @uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
    – H-H
    Aug 9 at 20:24















Yes, it is correct.
– uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40




Yes, it is correct.
– uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40












@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
– H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24




@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
– H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2877506%2flimit-of-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2877506%2flimit-of-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide