Increment of $arg(f(z))$ after one rotation

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm reading a paper and the author defines $Delta=arg(f(z))$ to be the increment of $arg(f(z))$ when $arg(z)$ for $z=e^iphi$ changes from $0$ to $2pi$. I understand that we're looking to find the difference of the arguments of $f(z)$ after $z$ makes one full rotation around the unit circle, but I'm also confused: $e^i0=e^i2pi$ so $f(e^i0)=f(e^i2pi)$, so would $Delta$ be anything besides 0?!



Thanks for the help, I'm new to complex analysis.







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm reading a paper and the author defines $Delta=arg(f(z))$ to be the increment of $arg(f(z))$ when $arg(z)$ for $z=e^iphi$ changes from $0$ to $2pi$. I understand that we're looking to find the difference of the arguments of $f(z)$ after $z$ makes one full rotation around the unit circle, but I'm also confused: $e^i0=e^i2pi$ so $f(e^i0)=f(e^i2pi)$, so would $Delta$ be anything besides 0?!



    Thanks for the help, I'm new to complex analysis.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm reading a paper and the author defines $Delta=arg(f(z))$ to be the increment of $arg(f(z))$ when $arg(z)$ for $z=e^iphi$ changes from $0$ to $2pi$. I understand that we're looking to find the difference of the arguments of $f(z)$ after $z$ makes one full rotation around the unit circle, but I'm also confused: $e^i0=e^i2pi$ so $f(e^i0)=f(e^i2pi)$, so would $Delta$ be anything besides 0?!



      Thanks for the help, I'm new to complex analysis.







      share|cite|improve this question












      I'm reading a paper and the author defines $Delta=arg(f(z))$ to be the increment of $arg(f(z))$ when $arg(z)$ for $z=e^iphi$ changes from $0$ to $2pi$. I understand that we're looking to find the difference of the arguments of $f(z)$ after $z$ makes one full rotation around the unit circle, but I'm also confused: $e^i0=e^i2pi$ so $f(e^i0)=f(e^i2pi)$, so would $Delta$ be anything besides 0?!



      Thanks for the help, I'm new to complex analysis.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 9 at 16:24









      ToniAz

      987




      987




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, but the increment is the difference between the arguments of $f(z)$, not between the values of $f$. You have a function $f:G to mathbbC$ when $G subset mathbbC$ an open domain which contains the unit circle. Now let's define a curve $gamma:[0,2pi] to mathbbC$ by the rule $gamma(t)=f(e^it)$. Then by your definition the increment is $arg(gamma(2pi))-arg(gamma(0))$. Yes, the values of $gamma(2pi)$ and $gamma(0)$ are the same, but their arguments can still be different. For example, if $f$ is the identity function ($f(z)=z$) then you will get $gamma(0)=e^i0$ but $gamma(2pi)=e^2ipi$. The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different-$0$ and $2pi$ respectively. So the increment here will be $2pi$. Intuitively the increment is $2pi$ multiplied by the number of rotations that the curve $gamma$ does around the origin. A rotation counterclockwise counts as 1 rotation, a rotation clockwise counts as -1 rotation.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:14










          • Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
            – Mark
            Aug 9 at 17:30











          • Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:40










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2877403%2fincrement-of-argfz-after-one-rotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, but the increment is the difference between the arguments of $f(z)$, not between the values of $f$. You have a function $f:G to mathbbC$ when $G subset mathbbC$ an open domain which contains the unit circle. Now let's define a curve $gamma:[0,2pi] to mathbbC$ by the rule $gamma(t)=f(e^it)$. Then by your definition the increment is $arg(gamma(2pi))-arg(gamma(0))$. Yes, the values of $gamma(2pi)$ and $gamma(0)$ are the same, but their arguments can still be different. For example, if $f$ is the identity function ($f(z)=z$) then you will get $gamma(0)=e^i0$ but $gamma(2pi)=e^2ipi$. The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different-$0$ and $2pi$ respectively. So the increment here will be $2pi$. Intuitively the increment is $2pi$ multiplied by the number of rotations that the curve $gamma$ does around the origin. A rotation counterclockwise counts as 1 rotation, a rotation clockwise counts as -1 rotation.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:14










          • Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
            – Mark
            Aug 9 at 17:30











          • Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:40














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, but the increment is the difference between the arguments of $f(z)$, not between the values of $f$. You have a function $f:G to mathbbC$ when $G subset mathbbC$ an open domain which contains the unit circle. Now let's define a curve $gamma:[0,2pi] to mathbbC$ by the rule $gamma(t)=f(e^it)$. Then by your definition the increment is $arg(gamma(2pi))-arg(gamma(0))$. Yes, the values of $gamma(2pi)$ and $gamma(0)$ are the same, but their arguments can still be different. For example, if $f$ is the identity function ($f(z)=z$) then you will get $gamma(0)=e^i0$ but $gamma(2pi)=e^2ipi$. The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different-$0$ and $2pi$ respectively. So the increment here will be $2pi$. Intuitively the increment is $2pi$ multiplied by the number of rotations that the curve $gamma$ does around the origin. A rotation counterclockwise counts as 1 rotation, a rotation clockwise counts as -1 rotation.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:14










          • Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
            – Mark
            Aug 9 at 17:30











          • Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:40












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Yes, but the increment is the difference between the arguments of $f(z)$, not between the values of $f$. You have a function $f:G to mathbbC$ when $G subset mathbbC$ an open domain which contains the unit circle. Now let's define a curve $gamma:[0,2pi] to mathbbC$ by the rule $gamma(t)=f(e^it)$. Then by your definition the increment is $arg(gamma(2pi))-arg(gamma(0))$. Yes, the values of $gamma(2pi)$ and $gamma(0)$ are the same, but their arguments can still be different. For example, if $f$ is the identity function ($f(z)=z$) then you will get $gamma(0)=e^i0$ but $gamma(2pi)=e^2ipi$. The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different-$0$ and $2pi$ respectively. So the increment here will be $2pi$. Intuitively the increment is $2pi$ multiplied by the number of rotations that the curve $gamma$ does around the origin. A rotation counterclockwise counts as 1 rotation, a rotation clockwise counts as -1 rotation.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Yes, but the increment is the difference between the arguments of $f(z)$, not between the values of $f$. You have a function $f:G to mathbbC$ when $G subset mathbbC$ an open domain which contains the unit circle. Now let's define a curve $gamma:[0,2pi] to mathbbC$ by the rule $gamma(t)=f(e^it)$. Then by your definition the increment is $arg(gamma(2pi))-arg(gamma(0))$. Yes, the values of $gamma(2pi)$ and $gamma(0)$ are the same, but their arguments can still be different. For example, if $f$ is the identity function ($f(z)=z$) then you will get $gamma(0)=e^i0$ but $gamma(2pi)=e^2ipi$. The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different-$0$ and $2pi$ respectively. So the increment here will be $2pi$. Intuitively the increment is $2pi$ multiplied by the number of rotations that the curve $gamma$ does around the origin. A rotation counterclockwise counts as 1 rotation, a rotation clockwise counts as -1 rotation.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 9 at 16:46









          Mark

          95119




          95119











          • "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:14










          • Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
            – Mark
            Aug 9 at 17:30











          • Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:40
















          • "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:14










          • Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
            – Mark
            Aug 9 at 17:30











          • Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
            – ToniAz
            Aug 9 at 17:40















          "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
          – ToniAz
          Aug 9 at 17:14




          "The location of these points on the complex plane is the same but their arguments are different." The location of a point determines exactly its modulus and argument, right? for instance, the point $z=3$ has a modulus of $3$ and an argument of $0$.
          – ToniAz
          Aug 9 at 17:14












          Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
          – Mark
          Aug 9 at 17:30





          Not really. Imagine you make a counterclockwise rotation around the origin and return to the same point. You added $2pi$ to the argument, right? So $2pi$ is also an argument of $z=3$. Same thing about $4pi,-2pi,100pi$ and so on. Every complex number has infinitely many arguments, and the difference between each two is $2pi$ times an integer. So the modulus of a number is a function, but the argument is not, because it is multi-valued.
          – Mark
          Aug 9 at 17:30













          Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
          – ToniAz
          Aug 9 at 17:40




          Aha, I guess this is some sort of convention. I'll take that.
          – ToniAz
          Aug 9 at 17:40












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2877403%2fincrement-of-argfz-after-one-rotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide