Prove about real function of bounded variation [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $X$ be a interval on $mathbbR$ and $gin C^1(X)$, show that, if $g$ is a function of bounded variation, then $forall gin C^1(X)$ we have:



$$int_X^|g'(x)|,dx,,=,,sup:(x_j)_jinmathbbN,,,,textmonotonic sequence of,,,X$$



Does anyone know how to prove it?







share|cite|improve this question












closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy Aug 24 at 13:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Try using the mean value theorem to write any distance traveled $g(x) - g(y)$ as $g'(c)(x-y)$ for some $c in (x,y)$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 7:42














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $X$ be a interval on $mathbbR$ and $gin C^1(X)$, show that, if $g$ is a function of bounded variation, then $forall gin C^1(X)$ we have:



$$int_X^|g'(x)|,dx,,=,,sup:(x_j)_jinmathbbN,,,,textmonotonic sequence of,,,X$$



Does anyone know how to prove it?







share|cite|improve this question












closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy Aug 24 at 13:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Try using the mean value theorem to write any distance traveled $g(x) - g(y)$ as $g'(c)(x-y)$ for some $c in (x,y)$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 7:42












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $X$ be a interval on $mathbbR$ and $gin C^1(X)$, show that, if $g$ is a function of bounded variation, then $forall gin C^1(X)$ we have:



$$int_X^|g'(x)|,dx,,=,,sup:(x_j)_jinmathbbN,,,,textmonotonic sequence of,,,X$$



Does anyone know how to prove it?







share|cite|improve this question












Let $X$ be a interval on $mathbbR$ and $gin C^1(X)$, show that, if $g$ is a function of bounded variation, then $forall gin C^1(X)$ we have:



$$int_X^|g'(x)|,dx,,=,,sup:(x_j)_jinmathbbN,,,,textmonotonic sequence of,,,X$$



Does anyone know how to prove it?









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 23 at 7:39









F.inc

3208




3208




closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy Aug 24 at 13:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy Aug 24 at 13:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Jendrik Stelzner, user91500, Theoretical Economist, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • Try using the mean value theorem to write any distance traveled $g(x) - g(y)$ as $g'(c)(x-y)$ for some $c in (x,y)$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 7:42
















  • Try using the mean value theorem to write any distance traveled $g(x) - g(y)$ as $g'(c)(x-y)$ for some $c in (x,y)$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 7:42















Try using the mean value theorem to write any distance traveled $g(x) - g(y)$ as $g'(c)(x-y)$ for some $c in (x,y)$.
– 4-ier
Aug 23 at 7:42




Try using the mean value theorem to write any distance traveled $g(x) - g(y)$ as $g'(c)(x-y)$ for some $c in (x,y)$.
– 4-ier
Aug 23 at 7:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













It is clear that RHS $leq$LHS. For the other way let $epsilon >0$ and choose $delta$ such that $|x-y| <delta$ implies $|g'(x)-g'(y)| <epsilon $. [ Possible because $g'$ is uniformly continuous]. Consider a partition $x_i$ of $X$ with $|x_i+1-x_i|<delta$ for all $i$. Now write $sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$ as $sum |x_i+1-x_i||g'(t_i)|$ for some $t_i$ between $x_i$ and $x_i+1$ Now $int_X |g'(t)|, dt=sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t)|, dt$. From this show that $|int_X |g'(t)|, dt-sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t_i)|, dt| < epsilon$. This gives $int_X |g'(t)|, dt< epsilon + sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$. Conclude the proof from this.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It is clear that RHS $leq$LHS. For the other way let $epsilon >0$ and choose $delta$ such that $|x-y| <delta$ implies $|g'(x)-g'(y)| <epsilon $. [ Possible because $g'$ is uniformly continuous]. Consider a partition $x_i$ of $X$ with $|x_i+1-x_i|<delta$ for all $i$. Now write $sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$ as $sum |x_i+1-x_i||g'(t_i)|$ for some $t_i$ between $x_i$ and $x_i+1$ Now $int_X |g'(t)|, dt=sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t)|, dt$. From this show that $|int_X |g'(t)|, dt-sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t_i)|, dt| < epsilon$. This gives $int_X |g'(t)|, dt< epsilon + sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$. Conclude the proof from this.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      It is clear that RHS $leq$LHS. For the other way let $epsilon >0$ and choose $delta$ such that $|x-y| <delta$ implies $|g'(x)-g'(y)| <epsilon $. [ Possible because $g'$ is uniformly continuous]. Consider a partition $x_i$ of $X$ with $|x_i+1-x_i|<delta$ for all $i$. Now write $sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$ as $sum |x_i+1-x_i||g'(t_i)|$ for some $t_i$ between $x_i$ and $x_i+1$ Now $int_X |g'(t)|, dt=sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t)|, dt$. From this show that $|int_X |g'(t)|, dt-sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t_i)|, dt| < epsilon$. This gives $int_X |g'(t)|, dt< epsilon + sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$. Conclude the proof from this.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        It is clear that RHS $leq$LHS. For the other way let $epsilon >0$ and choose $delta$ such that $|x-y| <delta$ implies $|g'(x)-g'(y)| <epsilon $. [ Possible because $g'$ is uniformly continuous]. Consider a partition $x_i$ of $X$ with $|x_i+1-x_i|<delta$ for all $i$. Now write $sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$ as $sum |x_i+1-x_i||g'(t_i)|$ for some $t_i$ between $x_i$ and $x_i+1$ Now $int_X |g'(t)|, dt=sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t)|, dt$. From this show that $|int_X |g'(t)|, dt-sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t_i)|, dt| < epsilon$. This gives $int_X |g'(t)|, dt< epsilon + sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$. Conclude the proof from this.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        It is clear that RHS $leq$LHS. For the other way let $epsilon >0$ and choose $delta$ such that $|x-y| <delta$ implies $|g'(x)-g'(y)| <epsilon $. [ Possible because $g'$ is uniformly continuous]. Consider a partition $x_i$ of $X$ with $|x_i+1-x_i|<delta$ for all $i$. Now write $sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$ as $sum |x_i+1-x_i||g'(t_i)|$ for some $t_i$ between $x_i$ and $x_i+1$ Now $int_X |g'(t)|, dt=sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t)|, dt$. From this show that $|int_X |g'(t)|, dt-sum int_x_i^x_i+1 |g'(t_i)|, dt| < epsilon$. This gives $int_X |g'(t)|, dt< epsilon + sum |g(x_i+1)-g(x_i)|$. Conclude the proof from this.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 23 at 8:08









        Kavi Rama Murthy

        23.7k31033




        23.7k31033












            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide