Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?



OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.



Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$



UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.



UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 11:57






  • 1




    @Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:05










  • @DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:06






  • 1




    I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:08






  • 1




    Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
    – Ahmad
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:10














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?



OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.



Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$



UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.



UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 11:57






  • 1




    @Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:05










  • @DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:06






  • 1




    I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:08






  • 1




    Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
    – Ahmad
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:10












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?



OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.



Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$



UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.



UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.







share|cite|improve this question














Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?



OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.



Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$



UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.



UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 5 '17 at 17:03

























asked Jul 5 '17 at 11:31









Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris

5,10031941




5,10031941











  • Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 11:57






  • 1




    @Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:05










  • @DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:06






  • 1




    I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:08






  • 1




    Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
    – Ahmad
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:10
















  • Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 11:57






  • 1




    @Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:05










  • @DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:06






  • 1




    I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:08






  • 1




    Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
    – Ahmad
    Jul 5 '17 at 12:10















Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
– Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57




Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
– Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57




1




1




@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05




@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05












@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06




@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06




1




1




I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
– Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08




I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
– Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08




1




1




Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
– Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10




Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
– Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Here are the first $37$ terms:



$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
$$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
$$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$



(I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.



Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
$$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.



Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
$$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2347178%2fdo-all-terms-n-of-oeis-sequence-a228059-have-a-p-with-exponent-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Here are the first $37$ terms:



    $$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
    $$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
    $$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
    $$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
    $$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
    $$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
    $$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
    $$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
    $$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
    $$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
    $$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
    $$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    $$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$



    (I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.



    Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
    $$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
    is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.



    Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
    $$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
    is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Here are the first $37$ terms:



      $$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
      $$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
      $$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
      $$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
      $$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
      $$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
      $$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
      $$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
      $$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
      $$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
      $$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
      $$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      $$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$



      (I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.



      Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
      $$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
      is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.



      Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
      $$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
      is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Here are the first $37$ terms:



        $$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
        $$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
        $$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
        $$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
        $$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
        $$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
        $$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
        $$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
        $$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
        $$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
        $$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
        $$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$



        (I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.



        Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
        $$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.



        Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
        $$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
        is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Here are the first $37$ terms:



        $$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
        $$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
        $$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
        $$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
        $$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
        $$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
        $$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
        $$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
        $$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
        $$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
        $$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
        $$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        $$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$



        (I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.



        Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
        $$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
        is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.



        Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
        $$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
        is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 23 at 8:36









        Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris

        5,10031941




        5,10031941



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2347178%2fdo-all-terms-n-of-oeis-sequence-a228059-have-a-p-with-exponent-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide