Why is this isomorphism $M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$ an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4












Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras



$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$



Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then



$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$



where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses



$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$



and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$



and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.





My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?









share|cite|improve this question






















  • My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
    – Martin Brandenburg
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:35











  • @MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:36










  • Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:50










  • @JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:58










  • @JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
    – Ninja hatori
    Aug 25 at 15:26















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4












Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras



$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$



Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then



$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$



where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses



$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$



and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$



and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.





My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?









share|cite|improve this question






















  • My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
    – Martin Brandenburg
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:35











  • @MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:36










  • Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:50










  • @JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:58










  • @JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
    – Ninja hatori
    Aug 25 at 15:26













up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
4






4





Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras



$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$



Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then



$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$



where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses



$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$



and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$



and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.





My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?









share|cite|improve this question














Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras



$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$



Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then



$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$



where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses



$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$



and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$



and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.





My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?











share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 26 at 6:20









user26857

38.8k123778




38.8k123778










asked Dec 21 '12 at 12:26







user38268


















  • My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
    – Martin Brandenburg
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:35











  • @MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:36










  • Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:50










  • @JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:58










  • @JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
    – Ninja hatori
    Aug 25 at 15:26

















  • My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
    – Martin Brandenburg
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:35











  • @MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:36










  • Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:50










  • @JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 12:58










  • @JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
    – Ninja hatori
    Aug 25 at 15:26
















My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
– Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35





My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
– Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35













@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36




@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36












Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50




Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50












@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58




@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58












@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
– Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26





@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
– Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.

Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.

On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.

So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion

The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.

Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.



Reminder

Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.

Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.

This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 22:11






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:05











  • I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:26










  • I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:57






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 22 '12 at 8:07











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f263192%2fwhy-is-this-isomorphism-m-otimes-k-l-stackrel-simeq-longrightarrow-ml%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest





























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
7
down vote



accepted










Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.

Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.

On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.

So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion

The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.

Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.



Reminder

Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.

Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.

This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 22:11






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:05











  • I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:26










  • I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:57






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 22 '12 at 8:07















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.

Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.

On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.

So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion

The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.

Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.



Reminder

Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.

Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.

This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 22:11






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:05











  • I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:26










  • I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:57






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 22 '12 at 8:07













up vote
7
down vote



accepted







up vote
7
down vote



accepted






Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.

Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.

On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.

So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion

The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.

Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.



Reminder

Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.

Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.

This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.






share|cite|improve this answer














Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.

Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.

On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.

So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion

The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.

Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.



Reminder

Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.

Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.

This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 23 at 22:53

























answered Dec 21 '12 at 14:30









Georges Elencwajg

116k7175317




116k7175317











  • I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 22:11






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:05











  • I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:26










  • I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:57






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 22 '12 at 8:07

















  • I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 22:11






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:05











  • I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:26










  • I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
    – user38268
    Dec 21 '12 at 23:57






  • 1




    Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
    – Georges Elencwajg
    Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
















I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11




I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11




1




1




Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
– Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05





Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
– Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05













I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26




I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26












I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57




I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
– user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57




1




1




Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
– Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07





Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
– Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f263192%2fwhy-is-this-isomorphism-m-otimes-k-l-stackrel-simeq-longrightarrow-ml%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards