Why is this isomorphism $M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$ an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras
$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$
Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then
$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$
where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses
$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$
and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$
and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.
My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?
abstract-algebra field-theory algebraic-number-theory tensor-products
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras
$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$
Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then
$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$
where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses
$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$
and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$
and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.
My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?
abstract-algebra field-theory algebraic-number-theory tensor-products
My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
â Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35
@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36
Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50
@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58
@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras
$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$
Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then
$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$
where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses
$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$
and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$
and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.
My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?
abstract-algebra field-theory algebraic-number-theory tensor-products
Suppose that $L/K$ is a finite separable extension of fields and let $M$ denote the Galois closure of $L$. Let $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ denote the set of all $K$ - algebra homomorphisms from $L$ to $M$. Since $L/K$ is separable we know that the number of elements in $textrmHom_K(L,M)$ is equal to $[L:K]$. Now I want to prove that we have an isomorphism of $M$ - algebras
$$varphi : M otimes_K L stackrelsimeqlongrightarrow M^[L:K]$$
Proof that they are isomorphic as $K$ - modules : Write $L = K(a)$ for some $ ain L$ (we can do this via the primitive element theorem). Then
$$begineqnarray* M otimes_K L &=& M otimes_K K[a] \
&cong& Motimes_K K[x]/(f) hspace3mm textwhere $f$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ \
&cong& M[x]/(f)\
&cong& M[x]/(f_1ldots f_[L:K]) hspace3mm textwhere the $f_i$ are the distinct\ && hspace1.5in textirreducible factors of $f$ since $M/L$ is Galois \
&cong& M^[L:K]endeqnarray*$$
where the last step was using the Chinese remainder theorem. For the third last step, we consider the ses
$$ 0 to (f) to K[x] to K[x]/(f) to 0$$
and tensor with the exact functor $-otimes_K M$ to get
$$0 to (f) otimes_K M to K[x] otimes_K M to K[x]/(f) otimes_K M to 0$$
and so $$begineqnarray* M otimes_K K[x]/(f) &cong& K[x]/(f) otimes_K M \
&cong& fracK[x] otimes_K Mf otimes_K M\
& cong& M[x]/(f) endeqnarray*$$ where $(f)$ is now viewed as an ideal of $M[x]$.
My question is: The tensor product $M otimes_K L$ is a left $M$ - module, but why is it also an $M$ - algebra? Also why are the isomorphisms above isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras and not just $K$ - modules?
abstract-algebra field-theory algebraic-number-theory tensor-products
edited Aug 26 at 6:20
user26857
38.8k123778
38.8k123778
asked Dec 21 '12 at 12:26
user38268
My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
â Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35
@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36
Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50
@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58
@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
â Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35
@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36
Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50
@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58
@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26
My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
â Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35
My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
â Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35
@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36
@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36
Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50
Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50
@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58
@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58
@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26
@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.
Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.
On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.
So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion
The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.
Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.
Reminder
Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.
Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.
This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
1
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
1
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
 |Â
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.
Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.
On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.
So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion
The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.
Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.
Reminder
Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.
Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.
This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
1
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
1
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.
Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.
On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.
So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion
The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.
Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.
Reminder
Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.
Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.
This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
1
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
1
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.
Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.
On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.
So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion
The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.
Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.
Reminder
Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.
Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.
This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.
Let $S=Hom_K-alg(L,M)$ be the set of $K$-algebra morphisms $Lto M$ and consider the morphism of $K$-algebras $$f:Lto M^S:lmapsto (s(l))_s in S$$Since $M^S$ is an $M$-algebra, by the universal property of extension of scalars for algebras, $f$ extends to a morphism of $M$-algebras $$F:B=Motimes_K Lto M^S:b=motimes lmapsto (sigma_s(b))_sin S=(mcdot s (l))_sin S$$ Notice that the scalar multiplication by elements of $M$ on $Motimes_K L$ occurs via the left factor.
Notice also that we have used the canonical identification $$Hom_K-alg(L,M)stackrel =to Hom_L-alg(Motimes_KL,M):sstackrel =mapsto [sigma_s: motimes l mapsto ms(l)]$$ The morphism $F$ is surjective by the Reminder below.
On the other hand the domain $B=Motimes_K L$ of the morphism $F$ has dimension $operatorname dim_M Motimes_K L=[L:K]$ while its codomain $M^S$ has dimension $[M^S:M]=text cardS=[L:K]$ too, because the extension $L/K$ is separable.
So $F$ is a surjective linear map between vector spaces of same $M$-dimension and is thus an isomorphism.
Conclusion
The morphism $$F:Motimes_K Lto M^S:motimes lmapsto (mcdot sigma (l))_sigma in S$$ is an isomorphism of $M$-algebras.
Since $M^Scong M^[L:K]$ your question is answered, but in a more canonical way.
Reminder
Let $M$ be a field, $B$ an $M$-algebra and $sigma_1,cdots, sigma_n$ a finite family of distinct $M$-algebra morphisms $chi_j:Bto M$.
Then the resulting algebra morphism $F:Bto M^n:bmapsto (sigma_1(b),cdots, sigma_n(b))$ is surjective.
This results from the Chinese Theorem since the maximal ideals $operatorname Kersigma_j subset B$ are pairwise comaximal.
edited Jan 23 at 22:53
answered Dec 21 '12 at 14:30
Georges Elencwajg
116k7175317
116k7175317
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
1
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
1
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
 |Â
show 4 more comments
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
1
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
1
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
I always love it when you answer my questions because man that answer above was slick! I should have noticed that $M otimes_K L$ was just a way of "changing our coefficients". However, that being said in my proof above is there a way to see why my sequence of isomorphisms are isomorphisms of $M$ - algebras?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 22:11
1
1
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
Dear BenjaLim, thanks for the kind words. My proof is, despite appearances, quite close to yours: the various $K$-homomorphisms $sigma_i: L=K[a]to M$ are obtained by sending $a$ to the various roots $a_i$ of the separable polynomial $f$ [in your notation $f_i=x-a_i$], so I think that you could prove that your isomorphism is one of $M$-algebras by following what happens to a decomposable tensor $motimes l in Motimes L$ along your displayed isomorphisms.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 21 '12 at 23:05
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I like your proof in that it does not use the primitive element theorem. My proof will still work by induction (since any finite extension $L/K$ is always of the form $L = K(a_1,ldots,a_k)$ for $a_1,ldots,a_k in L$) but of course an element-free approach is always nicest. I will get back to you if I have any problems with my isomorphisms above.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:26
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
I see the edit that you made above about Dedekind's theorem. Is this the same one on linear independence of characters as in page 51 of here? Thanks.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 23:57
1
1
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
Dear BenjaLim, Milne's independence of characters is a corollary of the more general version I quote, obtained by taking $L=K$, $A=K[G]$ (the group algebra) and using the adjunction formula $Hom_grp(G,K^*)=Hom_K-alg(K[G],K)$.
â Georges Elencwajg
Dec 22 '12 at 8:07
 |Â
show 4 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f263192%2fwhy-is-this-isomorphism-m-otimes-k-l-stackrel-simeq-longrightarrow-ml%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
My question is: What motivates your question? The primitive element theorem is a basic tool in field theory. And your proof is standard.
â Martin Brandenburg
Dec 21 '12 at 12:35
@MartinBrandenburg Sorry I just realised I can do it without the primitive element theorem by inducting on the number of elements that we adjoint to $K$ to obtain $L$. I have changed my question now. I am sorry.
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:36
Don't you naturally get an $L$-algebra structure on the tensor product of two $L$-algebras? The algebra being commutative, $M$ will inject into its center, so you get an $M$-algebra structure, no?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 21 '12 at 12:50
@JyrkiLahtonen You're saying that $M otimes_K L$ is a $K$ - algebra (I get that) and hence an $M$ - algebra (which I don't get)?
â user38268
Dec 21 '12 at 12:58
@JyrkiLahtonen how to use chinese remainder theorem in above proo given by user about modules?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 25 at 15:26