Suppose $X$ is infinite and $A$ is a finite subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerous
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $X$ is infinite and that $A$ is a finite subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerous.
My attempt:
Let $|A|=n$. We will prove by induction on n. It's clear that the the theorem is trivially true for $n=0$. Assume the theorem is true for all $n=k$. For $n=k+1$, then $|A setminus a|=k$ for some $a in A$. Thus $X setminus (A setminus a) sim X$ by inductive hypothesis, or $(X cap a) cup (X setminus A) sim X$, or $a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. We have $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ since the theorem is true for $n=1$. Hence $X setminus A sim a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. Thus $X setminus A sim X$. This completes the proof.
Does this proof look fine or contain gaps? Do you have suggestions? Many thanks for your dedicated help!
Update: Here I prove that the theorem is true for $n=1$.
Assume that $A = a$ and consequently $X setminus A= X setminusa$. It's clear that $|X setminus A| le |X|$. Next we prove that $|X| le |X setminus A|$. Since $X$ is infinite, there exists $B subsetneq X$ such that $B sim X$ (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice). Thus $|X|=|B|$. There are only two possible cases.
- $a in X setminus B$
Then $B subseteq X setminus a=X setminus A$ and consequently $|X|=|B| le |X setminus A|$. Thus $|X| le |X setminus A|$ and $|X setminus A| le |X|$. By Schröder–Bernstein theorem, we have $|X setminus A| = |X|$. It follows that $X setminus A sim X$.
- $a in B$.
Let $b in X setminus B$. We define a bijection $f:X setminus a to X setminus b$ by $f(x)= x$ for all $x in X setminus a,b$ and $f(b)=a$. Thus $X setminus a sim X setminus b$. Since $b in X setminus B$, it follows from Case 1 that $X setminus b sim X$. Hence $X setminus a sim X setminus b sim X$. Thus $X setminus a = X setminus A sim X$.
To sum up, $X setminus A sim X$ for all $|A|=1$.
elementary-set-theory proof-verification infinity
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $X$ is infinite and that $A$ is a finite subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerous.
My attempt:
Let $|A|=n$. We will prove by induction on n. It's clear that the the theorem is trivially true for $n=0$. Assume the theorem is true for all $n=k$. For $n=k+1$, then $|A setminus a|=k$ for some $a in A$. Thus $X setminus (A setminus a) sim X$ by inductive hypothesis, or $(X cap a) cup (X setminus A) sim X$, or $a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. We have $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ since the theorem is true for $n=1$. Hence $X setminus A sim a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. Thus $X setminus A sim X$. This completes the proof.
Does this proof look fine or contain gaps? Do you have suggestions? Many thanks for your dedicated help!
Update: Here I prove that the theorem is true for $n=1$.
Assume that $A = a$ and consequently $X setminus A= X setminusa$. It's clear that $|X setminus A| le |X|$. Next we prove that $|X| le |X setminus A|$. Since $X$ is infinite, there exists $B subsetneq X$ such that $B sim X$ (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice). Thus $|X|=|B|$. There are only two possible cases.
- $a in X setminus B$
Then $B subseteq X setminus a=X setminus A$ and consequently $|X|=|B| le |X setminus A|$. Thus $|X| le |X setminus A|$ and $|X setminus A| le |X|$. By Schröder–Bernstein theorem, we have $|X setminus A| = |X|$. It follows that $X setminus A sim X$.
- $a in B$.
Let $b in X setminus B$. We define a bijection $f:X setminus a to X setminus b$ by $f(x)= x$ for all $x in X setminus a,b$ and $f(b)=a$. Thus $X setminus a sim X setminus b$. Since $b in X setminus B$, it follows from Case 1 that $X setminus b sim X$. Hence $X setminus a sim X setminus b sim X$. Thus $X setminus a = X setminus A sim X$.
To sum up, $X setminus A sim X$ for all $|A|=1$.
elementary-set-theory proof-verification infinity
What's your definition of $X$ being infinite?
– Paul K
Sep 10 at 15:51
@PaulK $X$ is infinite if and only if $X$ is not finite.
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 15:55
@PaulK of infinite cardinality
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:57
The proof is somewhat lacking in elegance, but formally correct
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:58
@MichałZapała I'm very curious about your elegant approach. Could you please elaborate on it?
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 16:08
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $X$ is infinite and that $A$ is a finite subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerous.
My attempt:
Let $|A|=n$. We will prove by induction on n. It's clear that the the theorem is trivially true for $n=0$. Assume the theorem is true for all $n=k$. For $n=k+1$, then $|A setminus a|=k$ for some $a in A$. Thus $X setminus (A setminus a) sim X$ by inductive hypothesis, or $(X cap a) cup (X setminus A) sim X$, or $a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. We have $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ since the theorem is true for $n=1$. Hence $X setminus A sim a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. Thus $X setminus A sim X$. This completes the proof.
Does this proof look fine or contain gaps? Do you have suggestions? Many thanks for your dedicated help!
Update: Here I prove that the theorem is true for $n=1$.
Assume that $A = a$ and consequently $X setminus A= X setminusa$. It's clear that $|X setminus A| le |X|$. Next we prove that $|X| le |X setminus A|$. Since $X$ is infinite, there exists $B subsetneq X$ such that $B sim X$ (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice). Thus $|X|=|B|$. There are only two possible cases.
- $a in X setminus B$
Then $B subseteq X setminus a=X setminus A$ and consequently $|X|=|B| le |X setminus A|$. Thus $|X| le |X setminus A|$ and $|X setminus A| le |X|$. By Schröder–Bernstein theorem, we have $|X setminus A| = |X|$. It follows that $X setminus A sim X$.
- $a in B$.
Let $b in X setminus B$. We define a bijection $f:X setminus a to X setminus b$ by $f(x)= x$ for all $x in X setminus a,b$ and $f(b)=a$. Thus $X setminus a sim X setminus b$. Since $b in X setminus B$, it follows from Case 1 that $X setminus b sim X$. Hence $X setminus a sim X setminus b sim X$. Thus $X setminus a = X setminus A sim X$.
To sum up, $X setminus A sim X$ for all $|A|=1$.
elementary-set-theory proof-verification infinity
Suppose that $X$ is infinite and that $A$ is a finite subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerous.
My attempt:
Let $|A|=n$. We will prove by induction on n. It's clear that the the theorem is trivially true for $n=0$. Assume the theorem is true for all $n=k$. For $n=k+1$, then $|A setminus a|=k$ for some $a in A$. Thus $X setminus (A setminus a) sim X$ by inductive hypothesis, or $(X cap a) cup (X setminus A) sim X$, or $a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. We have $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ since the theorem is true for $n=1$. Hence $X setminus A sim a cup (X setminus A) sim X$. Thus $X setminus A sim X$. This completes the proof.
Does this proof look fine or contain gaps? Do you have suggestions? Many thanks for your dedicated help!
Update: Here I prove that the theorem is true for $n=1$.
Assume that $A = a$ and consequently $X setminus A= X setminusa$. It's clear that $|X setminus A| le |X|$. Next we prove that $|X| le |X setminus A|$. Since $X$ is infinite, there exists $B subsetneq X$ such that $B sim X$ (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice). Thus $|X|=|B|$. There are only two possible cases.
- $a in X setminus B$
Then $B subseteq X setminus a=X setminus A$ and consequently $|X|=|B| le |X setminus A|$. Thus $|X| le |X setminus A|$ and $|X setminus A| le |X|$. By Schröder–Bernstein theorem, we have $|X setminus A| = |X|$. It follows that $X setminus A sim X$.
- $a in B$.
Let $b in X setminus B$. We define a bijection $f:X setminus a to X setminus b$ by $f(x)= x$ for all $x in X setminus a,b$ and $f(b)=a$. Thus $X setminus a sim X setminus b$. Since $b in X setminus B$, it follows from Case 1 that $X setminus b sim X$. Hence $X setminus a sim X setminus b sim X$. Thus $X setminus a = X setminus A sim X$.
To sum up, $X setminus A sim X$ for all $|A|=1$.
elementary-set-theory proof-verification infinity
elementary-set-theory proof-verification infinity
edited Sep 12 at 7:21
asked Sep 10 at 15:48
Le Anh Dung
1,2041421
1,2041421
What's your definition of $X$ being infinite?
– Paul K
Sep 10 at 15:51
@PaulK $X$ is infinite if and only if $X$ is not finite.
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 15:55
@PaulK of infinite cardinality
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:57
The proof is somewhat lacking in elegance, but formally correct
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:58
@MichałZapała I'm very curious about your elegant approach. Could you please elaborate on it?
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 16:08
|
show 4 more comments
What's your definition of $X$ being infinite?
– Paul K
Sep 10 at 15:51
@PaulK $X$ is infinite if and only if $X$ is not finite.
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 15:55
@PaulK of infinite cardinality
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:57
The proof is somewhat lacking in elegance, but formally correct
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:58
@MichałZapała I'm very curious about your elegant approach. Could you please elaborate on it?
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 16:08
What's your definition of $X$ being infinite?
– Paul K
Sep 10 at 15:51
What's your definition of $X$ being infinite?
– Paul K
Sep 10 at 15:51
@PaulK $X$ is infinite if and only if $X$ is not finite.
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 15:55
@PaulK $X$ is infinite if and only if $X$ is not finite.
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 15:55
@PaulK of infinite cardinality
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:57
@PaulK of infinite cardinality
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:57
The proof is somewhat lacking in elegance, but formally correct
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:58
The proof is somewhat lacking in elegance, but formally correct
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:58
@MichałZapała I'm very curious about your elegant approach. Could you please elaborate on it?
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 16:08
@MichałZapała I'm very curious about your elegant approach. Could you please elaborate on it?
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 16:08
|
show 4 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The proof (with the update) seems correct.
Assuming choice (or at least countable choice), we can do it perhaps more easily.
Since $A$ is finite, there is a bijection $gcolon0,1,dots,n-1to A$, for some $ninmathbbN$.
Fix an injection $fcolonmathbbNto Xsetminus A$ (which exists because $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, assuming countable choice) and define $psicolon Xsetminus Ato X$ by
$$
psi(x)=begincases
x & xnotin f(mathbbN) \[4px]
g(m) & x=f(m),quad 0 le m < n \[4px]
f(m-n) & x=f(m),quad m ge n
endcases
$$
Prove $psi$ is a bijection.
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Your proof is correct except for the step where you say that $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ by inductive hypothesis. I assume you are applying the inductive hypothesis (to the set $a cup (X setminus A)$) in the case $n=1$, which is fine as long as $k ge 1$. But your proof does not work in the case $k=0$. In other words, your proof correctly shows that if the theorem holds for $n=1$, then it holds for all larger values of $n$. But it does not prove that it holds for $n=1$.
In fact, the proof for $n=1$ is rather tricky. Here's a nice exercise: prove that the $n=1$ case for an infinite set $X$ is equivalent to the statement that $X$ contains a subset that is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. Now, the statement that every infinite set contains a subset equinumerous with the positive integers cannot be proven without some form of the axiom of choice. Therefore the proof of the $n=1$ case will also require the axiom of choice.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I found that @egreg's solution is very elegant, so I want to re-formalize it into the below proof. All credits go to @egreg.
Lemma 1: If $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B$ is countably infinite.
Lemma 2: If $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite.
Lemma 3: If $Y$ is infinite, then there exists $Bsubsetneq Y$ such that $B$ is countably infinite. (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice)
Since $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite by Lemma 2.
Since $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, there exists $Bsubsetneq Xsetminus A$ such that $B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 3.
Since $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 1.
Since $B sim Bbb N$ and $Acup B sim Bbb N$, $B sim Acup B$ and thus there exists an bijection $f_1:B to Acup B$.
Let $f_2:Xsetminus Asetminus B to Xsetminus Asetminus B$ be the identity map on $Xsetminus Asetminus B$. Then $f_2$ is a bijection.
We define $f:Xsetminus A to X$ by $f(x)=f_2(x)$ for all $x in Xsetminus Asetminus B$ and $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for all $x in B$. Thus $f$ is a bijection.
Hence $Xsetminus A sim X$.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The proof (with the update) seems correct.
Assuming choice (or at least countable choice), we can do it perhaps more easily.
Since $A$ is finite, there is a bijection $gcolon0,1,dots,n-1to A$, for some $ninmathbbN$.
Fix an injection $fcolonmathbbNto Xsetminus A$ (which exists because $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, assuming countable choice) and define $psicolon Xsetminus Ato X$ by
$$
psi(x)=begincases
x & xnotin f(mathbbN) \[4px]
g(m) & x=f(m),quad 0 le m < n \[4px]
f(m-n) & x=f(m),quad m ge n
endcases
$$
Prove $psi$ is a bijection.
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The proof (with the update) seems correct.
Assuming choice (or at least countable choice), we can do it perhaps more easily.
Since $A$ is finite, there is a bijection $gcolon0,1,dots,n-1to A$, for some $ninmathbbN$.
Fix an injection $fcolonmathbbNto Xsetminus A$ (which exists because $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, assuming countable choice) and define $psicolon Xsetminus Ato X$ by
$$
psi(x)=begincases
x & xnotin f(mathbbN) \[4px]
g(m) & x=f(m),quad 0 le m < n \[4px]
f(m-n) & x=f(m),quad m ge n
endcases
$$
Prove $psi$ is a bijection.
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The proof (with the update) seems correct.
Assuming choice (or at least countable choice), we can do it perhaps more easily.
Since $A$ is finite, there is a bijection $gcolon0,1,dots,n-1to A$, for some $ninmathbbN$.
Fix an injection $fcolonmathbbNto Xsetminus A$ (which exists because $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, assuming countable choice) and define $psicolon Xsetminus Ato X$ by
$$
psi(x)=begincases
x & xnotin f(mathbbN) \[4px]
g(m) & x=f(m),quad 0 le m < n \[4px]
f(m-n) & x=f(m),quad m ge n
endcases
$$
Prove $psi$ is a bijection.
The proof (with the update) seems correct.
Assuming choice (or at least countable choice), we can do it perhaps more easily.
Since $A$ is finite, there is a bijection $gcolon0,1,dots,n-1to A$, for some $ninmathbbN$.
Fix an injection $fcolonmathbbNto Xsetminus A$ (which exists because $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, assuming countable choice) and define $psicolon Xsetminus Ato X$ by
$$
psi(x)=begincases
x & xnotin f(mathbbN) \[4px]
g(m) & x=f(m),quad 0 le m < n \[4px]
f(m-n) & x=f(m),quad m ge n
endcases
$$
Prove $psi$ is a bijection.
edited Sep 13 at 21:34
answered Sep 12 at 8:53
egreg
172k1283194
172k1283194
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
add a comment |
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
Thank you so much!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 8:55
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
After I read your answer carefully, I found that your approach is much more elegant and simpler than mine. I decided to re-formalize it into a proof in my own words and posted as an answer at the end of this thread. If you don't mind, please have a look at it! Many thanks for you!
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 12 at 11:13
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
Typo: I think you mean $psi(x) = f(m-n)$ when $x = f(m)$, $m ge n$.
– Dan Velleman
Sep 13 at 21:32
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
@DanVelleman Thanks for noting!
– egreg
Sep 13 at 21:34
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Your proof is correct except for the step where you say that $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ by inductive hypothesis. I assume you are applying the inductive hypothesis (to the set $a cup (X setminus A)$) in the case $n=1$, which is fine as long as $k ge 1$. But your proof does not work in the case $k=0$. In other words, your proof correctly shows that if the theorem holds for $n=1$, then it holds for all larger values of $n$. But it does not prove that it holds for $n=1$.
In fact, the proof for $n=1$ is rather tricky. Here's a nice exercise: prove that the $n=1$ case for an infinite set $X$ is equivalent to the statement that $X$ contains a subset that is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. Now, the statement that every infinite set contains a subset equinumerous with the positive integers cannot be proven without some form of the axiom of choice. Therefore the proof of the $n=1$ case will also require the axiom of choice.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Your proof is correct except for the step where you say that $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ by inductive hypothesis. I assume you are applying the inductive hypothesis (to the set $a cup (X setminus A)$) in the case $n=1$, which is fine as long as $k ge 1$. But your proof does not work in the case $k=0$. In other words, your proof correctly shows that if the theorem holds for $n=1$, then it holds for all larger values of $n$. But it does not prove that it holds for $n=1$.
In fact, the proof for $n=1$ is rather tricky. Here's a nice exercise: prove that the $n=1$ case for an infinite set $X$ is equivalent to the statement that $X$ contains a subset that is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. Now, the statement that every infinite set contains a subset equinumerous with the positive integers cannot be proven without some form of the axiom of choice. Therefore the proof of the $n=1$ case will also require the axiom of choice.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Your proof is correct except for the step where you say that $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ by inductive hypothesis. I assume you are applying the inductive hypothesis (to the set $a cup (X setminus A)$) in the case $n=1$, which is fine as long as $k ge 1$. But your proof does not work in the case $k=0$. In other words, your proof correctly shows that if the theorem holds for $n=1$, then it holds for all larger values of $n$. But it does not prove that it holds for $n=1$.
In fact, the proof for $n=1$ is rather tricky. Here's a nice exercise: prove that the $n=1$ case for an infinite set $X$ is equivalent to the statement that $X$ contains a subset that is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. Now, the statement that every infinite set contains a subset equinumerous with the positive integers cannot be proven without some form of the axiom of choice. Therefore the proof of the $n=1$ case will also require the axiom of choice.
Your proof is correct except for the step where you say that $a cup (X setminus A) sim X setminus A$ by inductive hypothesis. I assume you are applying the inductive hypothesis (to the set $a cup (X setminus A)$) in the case $n=1$, which is fine as long as $k ge 1$. But your proof does not work in the case $k=0$. In other words, your proof correctly shows that if the theorem holds for $n=1$, then it holds for all larger values of $n$. But it does not prove that it holds for $n=1$.
In fact, the proof for $n=1$ is rather tricky. Here's a nice exercise: prove that the $n=1$ case for an infinite set $X$ is equivalent to the statement that $X$ contains a subset that is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. Now, the statement that every infinite set contains a subset equinumerous with the positive integers cannot be proven without some form of the axiom of choice. Therefore the proof of the $n=1$ case will also require the axiom of choice.
answered Sep 10 at 16:40
Dan Velleman
1663
1663
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I found that @egreg's solution is very elegant, so I want to re-formalize it into the below proof. All credits go to @egreg.
Lemma 1: If $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B$ is countably infinite.
Lemma 2: If $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite.
Lemma 3: If $Y$ is infinite, then there exists $Bsubsetneq Y$ such that $B$ is countably infinite. (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice)
Since $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite by Lemma 2.
Since $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, there exists $Bsubsetneq Xsetminus A$ such that $B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 3.
Since $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 1.
Since $B sim Bbb N$ and $Acup B sim Bbb N$, $B sim Acup B$ and thus there exists an bijection $f_1:B to Acup B$.
Let $f_2:Xsetminus Asetminus B to Xsetminus Asetminus B$ be the identity map on $Xsetminus Asetminus B$. Then $f_2$ is a bijection.
We define $f:Xsetminus A to X$ by $f(x)=f_2(x)$ for all $x in Xsetminus Asetminus B$ and $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for all $x in B$. Thus $f$ is a bijection.
Hence $Xsetminus A sim X$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I found that @egreg's solution is very elegant, so I want to re-formalize it into the below proof. All credits go to @egreg.
Lemma 1: If $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B$ is countably infinite.
Lemma 2: If $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite.
Lemma 3: If $Y$ is infinite, then there exists $Bsubsetneq Y$ such that $B$ is countably infinite. (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice)
Since $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite by Lemma 2.
Since $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, there exists $Bsubsetneq Xsetminus A$ such that $B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 3.
Since $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 1.
Since $B sim Bbb N$ and $Acup B sim Bbb N$, $B sim Acup B$ and thus there exists an bijection $f_1:B to Acup B$.
Let $f_2:Xsetminus Asetminus B to Xsetminus Asetminus B$ be the identity map on $Xsetminus Asetminus B$. Then $f_2$ is a bijection.
We define $f:Xsetminus A to X$ by $f(x)=f_2(x)$ for all $x in Xsetminus Asetminus B$ and $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for all $x in B$. Thus $f$ is a bijection.
Hence $Xsetminus A sim X$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I found that @egreg's solution is very elegant, so I want to re-formalize it into the below proof. All credits go to @egreg.
Lemma 1: If $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B$ is countably infinite.
Lemma 2: If $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite.
Lemma 3: If $Y$ is infinite, then there exists $Bsubsetneq Y$ such that $B$ is countably infinite. (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice)
Since $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite by Lemma 2.
Since $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, there exists $Bsubsetneq Xsetminus A$ such that $B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 3.
Since $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 1.
Since $B sim Bbb N$ and $Acup B sim Bbb N$, $B sim Acup B$ and thus there exists an bijection $f_1:B to Acup B$.
Let $f_2:Xsetminus Asetminus B to Xsetminus Asetminus B$ be the identity map on $Xsetminus Asetminus B$. Then $f_2$ is a bijection.
We define $f:Xsetminus A to X$ by $f(x)=f_2(x)$ for all $x in Xsetminus Asetminus B$ and $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for all $x in B$. Thus $f$ is a bijection.
Hence $Xsetminus A sim X$.
I found that @egreg's solution is very elegant, so I want to re-formalize it into the below proof. All credits go to @egreg.
Lemma 1: If $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B$ is countably infinite.
Lemma 2: If $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite.
Lemma 3: If $Y$ is infinite, then there exists $Bsubsetneq Y$ such that $B$ is countably infinite. (Here we assume Axiom of Countable Choice)
Since $X$ is infinite and $A$ is finite, then $Xsetminus A$ is infinite by Lemma 2.
Since $Xsetminus A$ is infinite, there exists $Bsubsetneq Xsetminus A$ such that $B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 3.
Since $A$ is finite and $B$ is countably infinite, then $Acup B sim Bbb N$ by Lemma 1.
Since $B sim Bbb N$ and $Acup B sim Bbb N$, $B sim Acup B$ and thus there exists an bijection $f_1:B to Acup B$.
Let $f_2:Xsetminus Asetminus B to Xsetminus Asetminus B$ be the identity map on $Xsetminus Asetminus B$. Then $f_2$ is a bijection.
We define $f:Xsetminus A to X$ by $f(x)=f_2(x)$ for all $x in Xsetminus Asetminus B$ and $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for all $x in B$. Thus $f$ is a bijection.
Hence $Xsetminus A sim X$.
answered Sep 12 at 11:11
Le Anh Dung
1,2041421
1,2041421
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912030%2fsuppose-x-is-infinite-and-a-is-a-finite-subset-of-x-then-x-and-x-setm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
What's your definition of $X$ being infinite?
– Paul K
Sep 10 at 15:51
@PaulK $X$ is infinite if and only if $X$ is not finite.
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 15:55
@PaulK of infinite cardinality
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:57
The proof is somewhat lacking in elegance, but formally correct
– Michał Zapała
Sep 10 at 15:58
@MichałZapała I'm very curious about your elegant approach. Could you please elaborate on it?
– Le Anh Dung
Sep 10 at 16:08